Geospatial analysis for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: gaps and opportunities


ja-19-271

Author(s): Zoe Matthews, Barbara Rawlins, Jennifer Duong, Yordanos B Molla, Allisyn C Moran, Kavita Singh, Florina Serbanescu, Andrew J Tatem, Kristine Nilsen

Year: 2019


Matthews  Z ,  Rawlins  B ,  Duong  J , et al.  Geospatial analysis for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: gaps and opportunities.  BMJ Global Health  2019; 4: e001702.
Geospatial analysis for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: gaps and opportunities Abstract:

Reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) indicators, such as the maternal mortality ratio, often serve as a litmus test for health system performance, because women’s and children’s health lies at the core of any health system.1The health and survival of women and children does not depend on a single intervention, but on packages of interventions delivered at all levels of the health system. Mapping and tracking RMNCAH therefore captures changes in wider health system performance. But mapping has traditionally been the domain of disease-specific tracking, providing useful, but limited snapshots of progress embedded in vertical intervention mechanisms. Although disease-specific spatial mapping and research are effective ways to identify geographic inequities and to inform service provision, geographic and spatial analyses of RMNCAH have the potential to provide a broader perspective. But such analyses, especially for routine RMNCAH care provision, have been underused despite their potential to inform programmes and policies in low/middle-income countries. This commentary also argues that visualisation of RMNCAH data provides a potent social accountability and decision-making tool. Given the topic’s importance, a supplement on the use of geographic information systems (GIS) in RMNCAH is long overdue.

Search Publications
Match against Title and Abstract.
Match Author Names.